Big bash League and MI Owner - (Source: AFP)In a significant development, Cricket Australia’s plan to privatise the BBL has hit a roadblock. The Australian Cricket Players' Association has passed a verdict, opposing the proposal. The union expressed concern over players’ future and rejected the plan to privatise the BBL.Notably, Cricket Australia had planned to open investments from private players by selling its stakes in each franchise so that the board could gain more capital and raise players’ salaries, eventually putting the BBL on a global map.Australia Players Union Rejects Privatisation ProposalFor the unversed, the governing rule of BBL states that the idea of privatisation cannot be fulfilled without the permission of the players’ Union. Hence, the rejection is a big blow to Cricket Australia.Union CEO Paul Marsh, speaking to The Herald Sun, confirmed that the association feels that the BBL privatisation is not good for the players, and also for the league’s future.“We are not aligned with the current direction of the process or the proposed MOU. We do not believe it will deliver the best outcome for the game or players,” Paul Marsh added.Why Did Australia Cricket Union Reject The BBL privatisation Idea?Notably, a few weeks ago, there were reports that Victoria are looking to put Melbourne Renegades up for sale and rebrand Melbourne Stars. The merger news sent everyone into a frenzy, sparking fears over players’ security.Therefore, it played a key role in the Cricketers’ Union making up their mind and rejecting the idea of privatisation.“In particular, the recent upheaval around Cricket Victoria’s proposed sale of the Renegades and merger with the Stars reinforces our view that the game is not yet aligned on an approach that will deliver the appropriate value in the privatisation process, Marsh added.What Is The Future Of BBL?The Cricketers' Union head remarked that the rejection of BBL privatisation is only for the near future. Marsh accepted that they are open to the idea of privatisation, but not now.Also Read: Steve Smith Named New Captain In America"It is likely this will take some time, and we ask players to be patient as we do this. Given that any sale of these teams is forever, we need to get this right, now,” Marsh said.Further, A high-stakes meeting between CA and all state is scheduled for Monday to determine the immediate future of the BBL. Now, it can lead to difference in opinions, arguments and also a civil war within Cricket Australia.However, one major plan that has been confirmed is the collaboration with IPL. For the unversed, the opening match of BBL 2026-27 will take place in India, probably Chennai.BBL Franchises Stand On Privatisation RejectionTalking about Australia teams, then Western Australia, Tasmania and Victoria are enthusiastic about the idea of privatisation - while South Australia is mostly on board. However, Queensland and New South Whales are the two franchises, not open to the idea of privatisation.BBL Privatisation Block: A Big Blow To IPL OwnersOver the past few years, IPL franchises have expanded globally, and now most of the teams have sister franchises outside India. The likes of MLC, SA20, and ILT20 are a few leagues where the IPL owners have already expanded their brand.In the latest events, The Hundred has also become privatised with the likes of MI, Sunrisers, and The Capitals owning franchises in England’s premier T20 league.The move to block Australia’s attempt to privatise the BBL is a big blow for IPL owners, as several of them were interested in buying teams Down Under.Also Read: RCB Star Breaks Silence On Virat Kohli-Travis Head Handshake Controversy
.jpg?type=mq "RCB Star Breaks Silence On Virat Kohli-Travis Head Handshake Controversy")