Jammu Kashmir official wants India vs Pakistan boycott despite ICC-PCB reconciliation

Satish Sharma Jay Shah and Mohsin Naqvi from the left [Source: X]

Just when it was thought the mega dilemma for the India vs Pakistan clash in the T20 World Cup 2026 had been solved, a new problem arose for the Indian side. Jammu and Kashmir Sports Minister Satish Sharma have voiced rejection of the match against Pakistan on February 15.

After more than a week-long impasse between the Pakistan Cricket Board and the International Cricket Council, on February 9, the Pakistan government officially agreed to send the Pakistan cricket team on the field for the group stage encounter against India; however, despite the reconciliation, it seems some segments of India still bar the engagement.

The final solution to the Pakistan-ICC standoff

The Pakistan government announced a boycott of the India vs Pakistan clash on February 15 to show solidarity with the Bangladesh ouster. ICC sent in warning messages for the cricket board in response, underlining the serious consequences it may face if it threatens to object to the ICC event with its boycott.

However, Pakistan remained firm on its stance until February 9, when Bangladesh Cricket Board President Aminul Islam Bulbul landed in Lahore to have a tripartite meeting with ICC and PCB to urge Pakistan to withdraw the ban.

Moving along the table of the Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, the Pakistani government finally agreed to waive off the deadlock. However, the J&K sentiments run strong against playing with Pakistan.

J&K government strongly opposes IND vs PAK game

Speaking to ANI, Jammu and Kashmir Sports Minister Satish Sharma was emotional as well as patriotic with his statements on the game.

"We should not play with them. Respect the good people. These are people who are robbing us in broad daylight, martyring our soldiers. So many of our Kashmiri people have been martyred, so many people from Jammu have been martyred.

I believe what the Government of India did recently shouldn't have happened. We are people of love; we know that whenever hatred has been defeated, it has been defeated by love. Hatred cannot be defeated by hatred. But anyway, we will talk about this," Satish told ANI.

India has long believed in the policy of "no talks until terror stops," with Pakistan, especially on the border of J&K. The continued loss of life of Indian soldiers to terrorists reinforces Sharma's stance that sporting engagements should not occur while these hostile acts continue.

The J&K and Pakistan conflict that led to the demand

As a minister from Jammu and Kashmir, Sharma's words reflect a deeper truth, since the region is the epicentre of the conflict. 

This could also be seen as a sports diplomacy strategy that Sharma has been trying to focus on, as if India does not play against Pakistan, international isolation may pressure Pakistan on its security policies as well.

The tension along the lines of Jammu and Kashmir

After the Indian government revoked Article 370, stripping J&K of its semi-autonomous status, Pakistan condemned the move as illegal and downgraded diplomatic ties while expelling India's High Commissioner.

Since then, militancy has seen a resurgence, with increased attacks on outsiders and non-local workers, particularly in districts like Rajouri, Poonch, Kathua, and Reasi.

The situation further escalated in early 2025, bringing both nations to the brink of a major conflict after the Pahalgam attack on April 22.

Hence, given the current state of affairs, Sharma's demand for engagement with Pakistan is still viewed as wrong as long as soldiers continue to be martyred along India’s borders.

J&K’s demands will fall on deaf ears

With that being said, it is likely that the India vs Pakistan T20 World Cup 2026 February 15 clash will continue to proceed as scheduled after the lift of the boycott.

The match is not in the interest of a single nation, and with many layers of authority and logistics as well as financial burden at stake, Satish Sharma’s demands are set to fall on deaf ears.

If India were to focus on the ‘geopolitical’ or sports diplomacy category, the Board of Control for Cricket in India would have denied visiting to Colombo for the match long ago, which they didn’t. Hence, in all possibilities, the mega clash is inevitable and is set to take place on the stipulated date.